religion
+5
Meganew Trek
Earthdeath
Shemuel
Darkjedi
me naam is m
9 posters
Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
what religion do you have?
Re: religion
oh yeah, forgot that. then tell him that annoying people with that is not loving, and that he will go to hell for it, because it's only for god to decide if you should go to hell for paganism.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
We don't have as many differences as you think. LOL!Darkwing wrote:oh dear, here we go again. ok, as much as dj and i have our religious differences, he's right. God came before nature, and you said, Christianity came after paganism, true, but Christianity is the religion on the belief that God is God and etc. God existed before paganism though, and created paganism in a sense. See, before paganism, before Christianity, before religion even, there was God.
It's just that our differences tend to stand out, rather than our similarities.
@ me naam
LOL!
Re: religion
hey, i was serious for once.
i actually think that. to believe or not to believe, that's one's own decision, and it's not for us to judge who is right or who goes to hell.
i actually think that. to believe or not to believe, that's one's own decision, and it's not for us to judge who is right or who goes to hell.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
and the egyptian gods put you on a giant set of scales to measure your truth of heart.all the same thing really.
Earthdeath- Commander
- Number of posts : 7919
Age : 53
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-04-18
Re: religion
no.
Earthdeath- Commander
- Number of posts : 7919
Age : 53
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-04-18
Re: religion
This means that God is the one that can tell weather we are good or not.
He is the best at this because, he is after all, wisdom itself.
Oh, and the Egyptian people's gods are all backed by demonic creatures thirsting for worship.
He is the best at this because, he is after all, wisdom itself.
Oh, and the Egyptian people's gods are all backed by demonic creatures thirsting for worship.
Re: religion
WTF???
what do you mean by the egyptian gods being bcked by demons hungry for worship?
what do you mean by the egyptian gods being bcked by demons hungry for worship?
Earthdeath- Commander
- Number of posts : 7919
Age : 53
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-04-18
Re: religion
he's right you know. and our differences Dj are big ones, you know, trinity stuff and things like that
Re: religion
You refuse to listen to what my religion says about the matter.
The trinity doctrine is unsupported by the bible, I've already made that quite clear.
But, you still hold on to it?
If you try to make the trinity doctrine work with true Christianity, the bible becomes inaccurate, and inconsistent.
When you don't put inject the trinity doctrine into Christianity, you get accuracy, and consistency.
The Trinity doctrine was invented a long time ago. It was invented, so that it would be easier for the pagans to convert to what was called Christianity in the old times.
Actually, even the word, Trinity is not mentioned in the bible at all.
Everything points against it.
You have let your pride get in the way of accepting the truth.
Should I post our little thread here?
Give me a reason why I shouldn't, please.
The trinity doctrine is unsupported by the bible, I've already made that quite clear.
But, you still hold on to it?
If you try to make the trinity doctrine work with true Christianity, the bible becomes inaccurate, and inconsistent.
When you don't put inject the trinity doctrine into Christianity, you get accuracy, and consistency.
The Trinity doctrine was invented a long time ago. It was invented, so that it would be easier for the pagans to convert to what was called Christianity in the old times.
Actually, even the word, Trinity is not mentioned in the bible at all.
Everything points against it.
You have let your pride get in the way of accepting the truth.
Should I post our little thread here?
Give me a reason why I shouldn't, please.
More like, they are demons.Earthdeath wrote:WTF???
what do you mean by the egyptian gods being bcked by demons hungry for worship?
Re: religion
And where in the Bible does it say God is not a pluralistic being?
EDIT
Well, I suppose I should put some Biblical quotes just to justify my Trinity claim, hmm?
Matthew 28:19: Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
2 Corinthians 13:14: The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with all of you.
1 John 5:7–8: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
It is a bit obscure, but they do seem to suggest some sort of close relationship between the three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Passages specifically referencing Jesus as God (because you do not accept that doctrine either.)
Isaiah 9:6 For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. (Specifically refers to Jesus, obviously. Now why would Jesus be referred to as "God" and "Father"? These were blasphemies punishable by death under the Law of Moses, unless it was true.)
John 8:58 I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am! (Now let's go back to Exodus. Who did God say he was to Moses? He says "I am who am." Coincidence? You decide.)
John 10:30: I and the Father are one. (Unless I have some sort of visual impairment, I think it says that Jesus = God.)
John 20:28: Thomas said to him, 'My Lord and my God!' (Same thing with the thing in Isaiah. Calling someone "God" or "Son of God" is a blasphemy and punishable by death, unless it was true. I think your Bible has this in it as well. Check it out.)
Matthew 28:17: When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. (Not allowed to worship anyone that is not God.)
Colossians 1:16: For by him [Jesus] all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. (Hold it! Did it just say Jesus created all things? I thought God created everything! Oh wait...)
Revelation 1:17–18: When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades."
Isaiah 44:6: This is what the LORD says—Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God.
Titus 2:13: ...while we wait for the blessed hope—the glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour, Jesus Christ.
1 John 5:20: We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true—even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.
Far too much Biblical support to doubt it.
EDIT
Well, I suppose I should put some Biblical quotes just to justify my Trinity claim, hmm?
Matthew 28:19: Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
2 Corinthians 13:14: The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with all of you.
1 John 5:7–8: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
It is a bit obscure, but they do seem to suggest some sort of close relationship between the three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Passages specifically referencing Jesus as God (because you do not accept that doctrine either.)
Isaiah 9:6 For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. (Specifically refers to Jesus, obviously. Now why would Jesus be referred to as "God" and "Father"? These were blasphemies punishable by death under the Law of Moses, unless it was true.)
John 8:58 I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am! (Now let's go back to Exodus. Who did God say he was to Moses? He says "I am who am." Coincidence? You decide.)
John 10:30: I and the Father are one. (Unless I have some sort of visual impairment, I think it says that Jesus = God.)
John 20:28: Thomas said to him, 'My Lord and my God!' (Same thing with the thing in Isaiah. Calling someone "God" or "Son of God" is a blasphemy and punishable by death, unless it was true. I think your Bible has this in it as well. Check it out.)
Matthew 28:17: When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. (Not allowed to worship anyone that is not God.)
Colossians 1:16: For by him [Jesus] all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. (Hold it! Did it just say Jesus created all things? I thought God created everything! Oh wait...)
Revelation 1:17–18: When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades."
Isaiah 44:6: This is what the LORD says—Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God.
Titus 2:13: ...while we wait for the blessed hope—the glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour, Jesus Christ.
1 John 5:20: We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true—even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.
Far too much Biblical support to doubt it.
Last edited by Alkanosis on 2008-11-18, 23:08; edited 1 time in total
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
Didn't we already go over this?
https://flashtrek.forumotion.co.uk/general-chat-f1/is-there-one-true-religion-t263.htm
Anyways, it's never says that he is a pluralistic being in the first place.
I suggest you re-read our discussion about that in the link.
https://flashtrek.forumotion.co.uk/general-chat-f1/is-there-one-true-religion-t263.htm
Anyways, it's never says that he is a pluralistic being in the first place.
I suggest you re-read our discussion about that in the link.
Re: religion
Alright, I edited my post to actually make it a viable response.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
ei yi yi, ok DJ, you're not listening to me, so I'll explain later when I'm not going to bed. (see what you've started whoever created this topic)
Anyways, tomorrow or whatever, I prove that your scholars delibrately mistranslated the Bible, so it would fit what they wanted it to believe, therefore making it unsupporting the trinity. time for a little lesson in greek!
Anyways, tomorrow or whatever, I prove that your scholars delibrately mistranslated the Bible, so it would fit what they wanted it to believe, therefore making it unsupporting the trinity. time for a little lesson in greek!
Re: religion
Yeah, that's what I learned in Sunday School a while back, too. If I remember correctly, our teacher (who had a version of the New World Version with him) showed us John 20:28 which basically says the same thing as other Protestant versions, which contradicts Jehovah's Witness doctrine.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
Yay! Religious conflict between DJ and Alka!!!
*sits down and gets popcorn*
*sits down and gets popcorn*
Meganew Trek- BANNED
- Number of posts : 2656
Age : 28
Location : The USS [strike]Dreadnought.[/strike] banned
Registration date : 2008-06-06
Re: religion
(warning, meant for meganew only)
am i clear that way, meganew?
exactly. i did that on purpose.
i have read some more religious discussions than you, i guess.
ok.who believes that the bible was written in greek?
it was written in hebrew!
it is stated in the bible that 'Jesus christ and the LORD are of the same material.' that has been translated, where 'material' comes from a word that means both material, flesh, being, spirit and mind.
that's the only proof i need.
- Spoiler:
- THIS IS SPAMMMAAAA!!!
*kicks meganew into never-ending pit of death*
am i clear that way, meganew?
Darkwing wrote:(see what you've started whoever created this topic)
exactly. i did that on purpose.
i have read some more religious discussions than you, i guess.
ok.who believes that the bible was written in greek?
it was written in hebrew!
it is stated in the bible that 'Jesus christ and the LORD are of the same material.' that has been translated, where 'material' comes from a word that means both material, flesh, being, spirit and mind.
that's the only proof i need.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Well nobody here is an expert in Hebrew.
Shemuel- Captain
- Number of posts : 10418
Age : 32
Registration date : 2007-12-23
Re: religion
lol yea, true.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Ah! Alkanosis, you edited your post. LOL!
I'll get to work on the stuff you posted soon.
(Probably tonight, we'll see.)
@ Darkwing
I'll be looking forward to this.
@ the people that just posted
The bible was written in Greek and Hebrew.
The "old testament" was written in Hebrew, and the "new testament" was written in Greek.
I'll get to work on the stuff you posted soon.
(Probably tonight, we'll see.)
@ Darkwing
I'll be looking forward to this.
@ the people that just posted
The bible was written in Greek and Hebrew.
The "old testament" was written in Hebrew, and the "new testament" was written in Greek.
Re: religion
Darkjedi wrote:The "old testament" was written in Hebrew, and the "new testament" was written in Greek.
uh-uh. wrong the first Christians were former jews, not greeks! it has been like this: hebrew --> greek --> latin --> modern langauges.
that means there were 3! translations, witrh all possible errors too.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Some of the new testament was written in hebrew, some in Greek, and possibly a tiny bit of latin but I'm not sure.
Shemuel- Captain
- Number of posts : 10418
Age : 32
Registration date : 2007-12-23
Re: religion
marcus wrote in latin, but a whole lot later.
oh, here's some interesting literature for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible#Characteristics_of_early_Bible_texts
oh, here's some interesting literature for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible#Characteristics_of_early_Bible_texts
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
me naam is m wrote:Darkjedi wrote:The "old testament" was written in Hebrew, and the "new testament" was written in Greek.
uh-uh. wrong the first Christians were former jews
And? If anything, that's just more proof that the NT was probably written in Greek. The common language throughout the Roman Empire, contrary to popular belief, is Koine Greek, not Latin. If people wanted to get anywhere in life, they would have to be educated in the language of the Empire.
And just to get this straight, the three original languages of the Bible are Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. Most Jews of the time, including Jesus, spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew, people.
And DJ, don't be a condescending bum. I edited my post because it said literally nothing at all. I added the whole bunch of Biblical quotes, which you are conveniently ignoring. I changed nothing, I only added to it.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
oww yeah. Aramaic.
sorry, i confuse these two sometimes.
but if you want some real, touchable proof: the dead sea scrolls are in Aramaic. and they're not much younger than jesus, so...
sorry, i confuse these two sometimes.
but if you want some real, touchable proof: the dead sea scrolls are in Aramaic. and they're not much younger than jesus, so...
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Precisely. The fruits of the Essenes' works = the Dead Sea Scrolls. Anyways, is the original languages of the Bible really that important? Sure, there are slight distortions between each translation, but most translations nowadays go back to the original texts so they are accurate enough for scholar work.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
well, the problem is that Aramaic, ancient Hebrew and Latin are languages which can be very ambivalent, causing many possibilities for different interpretations.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
That is true. Hebrew and Aramaic have these tendencies for poetic, and flowery words and Greek has a weird grammatical structure that makes me glad we don't have Ancient Greek at our school. Still, it's not about what the words specifically say, it's about the meaning behind them. Still, for all the scholarly work, we have the King James Version.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
i guess latin is the easiest of them all. even i can read it.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
It has such obvious connections with the western european languages. even for dutch, there should be plenty of similarities between it and latin.
Shemuel- Captain
- Number of posts : 10418
Age : 32
Registration date : 2007-12-23
Re: religion
yeah. a bit less than English though, since we got more Germanic in it.
but the advantage that you can speak out a Latin text just as if you read it in dutch.
englishmen etc. have to learn new pronunciations too.
but the advantage that you can speak out a Latin text just as if you read it in dutch.
englishmen etc. have to learn new pronunciations too.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Oh well. It's still easy though.
England are playing Germany in football- I don't know who I want to lose more!
England are playing Germany in football- I don't know who I want to lose more!
Shemuel- Captain
- Number of posts : 10418
Age : 32
Registration date : 2007-12-23
Re: religion
same here.i hate football, and things being admitted, england sucks.and so does germany.
Earthdeath- Commander
- Number of posts : 7919
Age : 53
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-04-18
Re: religion
England won.
But back on topic.
But back on topic.
Shemuel- Captain
- Number of posts : 10418
Age : 32
Registration date : 2007-12-23
Re: religion
good. we have a saying here in the Netherlands, specifically for soccer-playing Germany: 'schade, deutschland alles ist forbei' basically meaning sorry for you Germany, but we kicked you out of the league.
(like we do usually)
(like we do usually)
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Condescending?Alkanosis wrote:me naam is m wrote:Darkjedi wrote:The "old testament" was written in Hebrew, and the "new testament" was written in Greek.
uh-uh. wrong the first Christians were former jews
And? If anything, that's just more proof that the NT was probably written in Greek. The common language throughout the Roman Empire, contrary to popular belief, is Koine Greek, not Latin. If people wanted to get anywhere in life, they would have to be educated in the language of the Empire.
And just to get this straight, the three original languages of the Bible are Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. Most Jews of the time, including Jesus, spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew, people.
And DJ, don't be a condescending bum. I edited my post because it said literally nothing at all. I added the whole bunch of Biblical quotes, which you are conveniently ignoring. I changed nothing, I only added to it.
I think you kinda too that wrong.
Oh, and I'm not conveniently ignoring those scriptures.
I had some things to do.
Like, raking the leaves, walking the dog, cleaning dishes, and lots of other chores.
What's your problem?
You know that I'm not going to sit back and not answer you questions.
When have I ever done that?
Note: You're correct about the greek.
Me naam is wrong.
Re: religion
Darkjedi wrote:Condescending?
I think you kinda too that wrong.
Darkjedi wrote:Ah! Alkanosis, you edited your post. LOL!
How was I supposed to take it then? I thought you were being condescending, honestly. =P
Darkjedi wrote:[color=olive]I had some things to do.
Like, raking the leaves, walking the dog, cleaning dishes, and lots of other chores.
Ah... sorry. I thought you were just ignoring it with an excuse that you would do it later. Sorry about that. And most of the New Testament, as far as I know, was originally in Greek.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
Ah... sorry. I thought you were just ignoring it with an excuse that you would do it later. Sorry about that. And most of the New Testament, as far as I know, was originally in Greek.
I'll have to agree.
No, I was just really surprised. LOL!How was I supposed to take it then? I thought you were being condescending, honestly. =P
I mean, how would you feel if you saw that many scriptures on one page?
LOL!
Re: religion
Just to illustrate my point that, despite you saying that scriptural support for the Trinity doctrine or the Jesus=God doctrine doesn't exist, there is actually an overwhelming amount of support for them.
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
Alka, you are literally becoming my best friend on this subject. And you're doing a lot of work for me too! Anyways, haven't had time to do all my research and stuff, been busy with school, but Alka's doin a fine job of throwin the ball. Anyways, my dad used to know a little greek, but he can barely read it now, it's been soooo long since he practiced, but he did read a little to me once, and we have a greek new testament too, i can almost make out some of the words, like Christ! Anyways, I have some really good examples, but I want to refind them to get the words right, and to source them. Mind you, this is not, blow you out of the water material, this is just another piece of evidence, that's all. Keep that in mind when I debate religion, we cannot completely comprehend the persona of God, we can only do our best at reading him. So, when we debate the Trinity, that is essentially what we are debating, the person of God, and the idea of a trinity makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, I understand and know that, but then again, he is God after all.
Re: religion
Darkwing wrote:but then again, he is God after all.
exactly. all relegious debates will come back to this.
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
alkanosis wrote:Matthew 28:19: Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
alkanosis wrote:2 Corinthians 13:14: The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with all of you.
These scriptures say nothing about there being three coequal persons in one God.
They do not say that each of these mentioned is a God. They do not say that all three are equal in substance, power and eternity.
They do not say all are to be worshiped. Since they do not say these things, then they do not teach the trinity, for all those claims
are made concerning the trinity.
So, yes. It was accurate for you too call them obscure when attempting to use them to support the trinity doctrine.
“God” means a mighty one, and men are called gods (Psalms 82:6), Satan is called a god (2 Corinthians. 4:4), and ChristAlkanosis wrote:Isaiah 9:6 For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. (Specifically refers to Jesus, obviously. Now why would Jesus be referred to as "God" and "Father"? These were blasphemies punishable by death under the Law of Moses, unless it was true.)
Jesus is called a god (John 1:1); but Jehovah is The God, the Almighty God.
But, note that in Isaiah 9:6 Jesus was not called "Almighty God", but instead "Mighty God".
So, this does not denote that Jesus is the Almighty God, since he was only called the Mighty God.
When Jesus simply said "I am" in John, he was saying that he existed before Abraham.John 8:58 I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am! (Now let's go back to Exodus. Who did God say he was to Moses? He says "I am who am." Coincidence? You decide.)
In Exodus 6:2 , the translation in your bible "I am who am" can be misleading.
In many, if not most translations, it says "I am the LORD" at Exodus 6:2.
Why is that word, lord in bold?
The translators of the bible translations that have this emboldened word have emboldened it because they didn't exactly know
what to put there.
In the Hebrew writing, this word that they didn't know what to do with is called the Tetragrammaton.
Yahweh is the English rendering of this Tetragrammaton.
And, when vocalized into English, you get Jehovah.
This is why, in the NWT, Exodus 6:2 is translated:
And God went on to speak to Moses and to say to him: “I am Jehovah.
It looks like your translators decided to replace this rendering.
But, sadly, they made the end product very misleading.
"I am who am" doesn't come close to "I am Jehovah" or even "I am the LORD".
Well anyways, God was not stating that he is am. LOL, sounds like cat in the hat.
"Sam I am". :P
Sorry.
Hey, who says bible translation can't be funny?
alkanosis wrote:John 10:30: I and the Father are one. (Unless I have some sort of visual impairment, I think it says that Jesus = God.)
Here, I got lazy and found this in an old Watchtower magazine article back from 1957.
Man, I think we were still using the King James Version back then. LOL!
Oh, well. It still makes sense. Here it is:
By these words Jesus did not say that he and his Father together made one God, coequal and coeternal. If you argue that he was saying this, as trinitarians do, then you must also believe that all of Christ’s followers become God: “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; that they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us.” Just as Jesus is one with God, so are the followers of Jesus one with God. There is oneness in belief and purpose and work. The Bible speaks of one man planting and another watering to get an increase, and because both work with the same end in view it states: “Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one.” In this sense God and Jesus and Jesus’ followers are one.—John 17:20, 21; 1 Cor. 3:8.
Last edited by Darkjedi on 2008-11-21, 08:42; edited 1 time in total
Re: religion
There is no objection to Thomas’ referring to Jesus as a god.alkanosis wrote:John 20:28: Thomas said to him, 'My Lord and my God!' (Same thing with the thing in Isaiah. Calling someone "God" or "Son of God" is a blasphemy and punishable by death, unless it was true. I think your Bible has this in it as well. Check it out.)
Such would be in harmony with the fact that Jesus, in his prehuman existence, certainly was a god, that is, a powerful, divine
person.
And he certainly has been that since his death and resurrection to heavenly life. Jesus even quoted from the Psalms to show
that powerful humans were addressed as “gods.” (Psalm 82:1-6; John 10:34, 35)
The apostle Paul noted that there were “many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords.’” (1 Corinthians 8:5)
And, as I mentioned before, even Satan is called “the god of this system of things.”
So, when Thomas referred to Jesus as a god, he wasn't in the wrong.
Other bible translations have rendered this scripture differently.Matthew 28:17: When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. (Not allowed to worship anyone that is not God.)
"There they saw Him and prostrated themselves before Him."
"And when they saw him, they did homage to him: but some doubted."
"and having seen him, they bowed to him, but some did waver."
"and when they saw him they did obeisance, but some doubted."
So, there is a great deal of controversy on how this scripture should be translated.
Not all of these translations designate that Jesus disciples worshiped him.
Because the translation is unclear, we cannot use this scripture as a determining factor while debating the trinity doctrine.
Colossians 1:16: For by him [Jesus] all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. (Hold it! Did it just say Jesus created all things? I thought God created everything! Oh wait...)
If you take a look at verse 15 of this chapter and verse 16 together, the context becomes more clear.
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him."
Don't you think it would make sense if we were to say that God created Jesus, and therefore Jesus created everything else?
But, Jehovah still in a sense created everything. It still makes sense.
Oh, and another thing I liked about this scripture....
The scripture is obviously talking about Jesus, you yourself stated that.
The scripture states that Jesus is the "firstborn of all creation".
Now, if Jesus is God, then how could God create himself?
Please tell me how that supports the trinity doctrine.
Well, Revelation is a very difficult book of the bible to make meaning of. But, I found this explanation of this scripture in a book called "Revelation Its Grand Climax at Hand!"
Revelation 1:17–18: When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades."
Here it is:
“The First and the Last”
2 Nevertheless, our awe need not give way to morbid fear. Jesus reassured John, as the apostle next relates. “And he laid his right hand upon me and said: ‘Do not be fearful. I am the First and the Last, and the living one.’” (Revelation 1:17b, 18a) In Isaiah 44:6, Jehovah rightly describes his own position as the one and only almighty God*, saying: “I am the first and I am the last, and besides me there is no God.” When Jesus presents himself by the title “the First and the Last,” he is not claiming equality with Jehovah, the Grand Creator. He is using a title properly bestowed on him by God. In Isaiah, Jehovah was making a statement about His unique position as the true God. He is God eternal, and besides him there is indeed no God. (1 Timothy 1:17) In Revelation, Jesus is talking about his bestowed title, calling attention to his unique resurrection.
3 Jesus was indeed “the First” human to be resurrected to immortal spirit life. (Colossians 1:18) Moreover, he is “the Last” to be so resurrected by Jehovah personally. Thus, he becomes “the living one . . . living forever and ever.” He enjoys immortality. In this, he is like his immortal Father, who is called “the living God.” (Revelation 7:2; Psalm 42:2) For all others of humanity, Jesus himself is “the resurrection and the life.” (John 11:25) In harmony with this, he says to John: “I became dead, but, look! I am living forever and ever, and I have the keys of death and of Hades.” (Revelation 1:18b) Jehovah has given him the authority to resurrect the dead. That is why Jesus can say that he has the keys to unlock the gates for those bound by death and Hades (gravedom).—Compare Matthew 16:18.
Oh, and the footnote:
In the original Hebrew at Isaiah 44:6, there is no definite article with the words “first” and “last,” whereas in Jesus’ description of himself in the original Greek at Revelation 1:17, the definite article is found. So, grammatically, Revelation 1:17 indicates a title, whereas Isaiah 44:6 describes Jehovah’s Godship.
So, as you can see, Revelation 1:17–18 is not stating that Jesus is God.
This ties in with my explanation of the tetragrammaton, and how the word LORD is actually Jehovah.Isaiah 44:6: This is what the LORD says—Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God.
You can use my explanation of how Jesus was properly referred to as a God, but not the almighty god, as a satisfying answer to this scripture.Titus 2:13: ...while we wait for the blessed hope—the glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour, Jesus Christ
Well, first you must come to a correct understanding of this scripture.1 John 5:20: We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true—even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.
I found this article from a 2004 watchtower. You might find it enlightening:
That's pretty self-explanatory.Who Is “the True God and Life Everlasting”?
JEHOVAH, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, is the true God. He is the Creator, the one giving eternal life to those who love him. That is how many who read and believe the Bible would answer the question posed in the above title. Indeed, Jesus himself said: “This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ.”—John 17:3.
Yet, many churchgoers give the expression a different meaning. The words in the title come from 1 John 5:20, which says, in part: “We are in union with the true one, by means of his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and life everlasting.”
Believers in the Trinity doctrine hold that the demonstrative pronoun “this” (hou′tos) refers to its immediate antecedent, Jesus Christ. They assert that Jesus is “the true God and life everlasting.” This interpretation, however, is in conflict with the rest of the Scriptures. And many authoritative scholars do not accept this Trinitarian view. Cambridge University scholar B. F. Westcott wrote: “The most natural reference [of the pronoun hou′tos] is to the subject not locally nearest but dominant in the mind of the apostle.” Thus, the apostle John had in mind Jesus’ Father. German theologian Erich Haupt wrote: “It has to be determined whether the [hou′tos] of the next proposition refers to the locally and immediately preceding subject . . . or to the more distant antecedent God. . . . A testimony to the one true God seems more in harmony with the final warning against idols than a demonstration of the divinity of Christ.”
Even A Grammatical Analysis of the Greek New Testament, published by Rome’s Pontifical Biblical Institute, states: “[Hou′tos]: as a climax to [verses] 18-20 the ref[erence] is almost certainly to God the real, the true, [in] opp[osition to] paganism (v. 21).”
Often hou′tos, generally translated “this” or “this one,” does not refer to the immediately preceding subject of a phrase. Other scriptures illustrate the point. At 2 John 7, the same apostle and penman of the first letter wrote: “Many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This [hou′tos′] is the deceiver and the antichrist.” Here the pronoun cannot refer to the closest antecedent—Jesus. Obviously, “this” refers to those who denied Jesus. They collectively are “the deceiver and the antichrist.”
In his Gospel, the apostle John wrote: “Andrew the brother of Simon Peter was one of the two that heard what John said and followed Jesus. First this one [hou′tos] found his own brother, Simon.” (John 1:40, 41) It is evident that “this one” refers, not to the last person mentioned, but to Andrew. At 1 John 2:22, the apostle uses the same pronoun in a similar way.
Luke makes similar use of the pronoun, as seen at Acts 4:10, 11: “In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you impaled but whom God raised up from the dead, by this one does this man stand here sound in front of you. This [hou′tos′] is ‘the stone that was treated by you builders as of no account that has become the head of the corner.’” The pronoun “this” clearly does not refer to the man who was healed, though he is the one mentioned just before hou′tos. Certainly, “this” in verse 11 refers to Jesus Christ the Nazarene, who is the “cornerstone” on which the Christian congregation is founded.—Ephesians 2:20; 1 Peter 2:4-8.
Acts 7:18, 19 also illustrates the point: “There rose a different king over Egypt, who did not know of Joseph. This one [hou′tos] used statecraft against our race.” “This one” who oppressed the Jews was, not Joseph, but Pharaoh, the king of Egypt.
Such passages confirm the observation made by Greek scholar Daniel Wallace, who says that for Greek demonstratives, “what might be the nearest antecedent contextually might not be the nearest antecedent in the author’s mind.”
“The True One”
As the apostle John wrote, “the true One” is Jehovah, the Father of Jesus Christ. He is the only true God, the Creator. The apostle Paul acknowledged: “There is actually to us one God the Father, out of whom all things are.” (1 Corinthians 8:6; Isaiah 42: Another reason that Jehovah is “the true one” referred to at 1 John 5:20 is that he is the Source of truth. The psalmist called Jehovah “the God of truth” because He is faithful in all He does and cannot lie. (Psalm 31:5; Exodus 34:6; Titus 1:2) Referring to his heavenly Father, the Son said: “Your word is truth.” And regarding his own teaching, Jesus stated: “What I teach is not mine, but belongs to him that sent me.”—John 7:16; 17:17.
Jehovah is also “life everlasting.” He is the Source of life, the One giving it as an undeserved gift through Christ. (Psalm 36:9; Romans 6:23) Significantly, the apostle Paul said that God is “the rewarder of those earnestly seeking him.” (Hebrews 11:6) God rewarded his Son by raising him from the dead, and the Father will give the reward of everlasting life to those who serve Him with all their heart.—Acts 26:23; 2 Corinthians 1:9.
Hence, what conclusion should we come to? That Jehovah, and no one else, is “the true God and life everlasting.” He alone is worthy to receive exclusive worship from those whom he created.—Revelation 4:11.
Now, time for a counterattack. LOL!
Well, since I'm extremely tired now... :yawn:
I'll just let you read this:
http://watchtower.org/e/ti/index.htm
Actually, you'll notice I got a lot of my information from that brochure.
Some of it is even copied and pasted.
Hey, it's 5:33 A.M! What do you expect?
Well, have fun with that.
Who wants some pumpkin pie?
I'm hungry!!!
It's getting close to breakfast! LOL!
Yes we cannot completely comprehend the persona of God. I'll have to agree with you on that.Darkwing wrote:Keep that in mind when I debate religion, we cannot completely comprehend the persona of God, we can only do our best at reading him. So, when we debate the Trinity, that is essentially what we are debating, the person of God, and the idea of a trinity makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, I understand and know that, but then again, he is God after all.
But, we do have the bible. That's what he gave us to help us learn about him.
I think that is why I like studying the bible so much.
There's always something new to learn!
Re: religion
you're doing one thing wrong.
the hebrew bible does not say 'jahweh'. it just says: jhwh. the jews believ that the name of god is so holy, it cannot be spoken, nor written. according the jews, god DOES NOT HAVE A NAME. at least, not one comprehensible for men.
the thing is, that jhwh is an acronym, for 'i am, who is.'
the hebrew bible does not say 'jahweh'. it just says: jhwh. the jews believ that the name of god is so holy, it cannot be spoken, nor written. according the jews, god DOES NOT HAVE A NAME. at least, not one comprehensible for men.
the thing is, that jhwh is an acronym, for 'i am, who is.'
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Re: religion
Except in the case of Moses, who he said "I am who am.," MNIM.
Okay, I'm not even going to try to answer all of that at once. Too much for me to deal with at one time.
DJ, when we're arguing theology, it's kinda useful to be using the same translation just to avoid inconsistencies. But hey, I'll try.
Note the italicized bit. There is no God other than God Himself. How can you call Jesus a god if he is not God Himself? The First Commandment - Thou shalt have no gods before Me. You cannot say that Jesus and God are two separate beings if you equate Jesus to a divine godlike status without Jesus actually being God.
On Matthew 28:17 - Really have no idea how to argue this one if you refuse to use the mainstream Protestant versions (KJV, NIV, etc.) because that's just what I used.
Wow, that's a real bastardization of what the Bible really says in my opinion, but again, different translations. Useless to argue here as we both are sticking by our own translations...
Okay, I'm not even going to try to answer all of that at once. Too much for me to deal with at one time.
DJ, when we're arguing theology, it's kinda useful to be using the same translation just to avoid inconsistencies. But hey, I'll try.
DJ wrote:There is no objection to Thomas’ referring to Jesus as a god.
Note the italicized bit. There is no God other than God Himself. How can you call Jesus a god if he is not God Himself? The First Commandment - Thou shalt have no gods before Me. You cannot say that Jesus and God are two separate beings if you equate Jesus to a divine godlike status without Jesus actually being God.
On Matthew 28:17 - Really have no idea how to argue this one if you refuse to use the mainstream Protestant versions (KJV, NIV, etc.) because that's just what I used.
DJ wrote:He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him.
Wow, that's a real bastardization of what the Bible really says in my opinion, but again, different translations. Useless to argue here as we both are sticking by our own translations...
Philly Homer- Commander
- Number of posts : 7388
Age : 31
Location : F/GO
Registration date : 2007-10-22
Re: religion
Sorry. LOL!DJ, when we're arguing theology, it's kinda useful to be using the same translation just to avoid inconsistencies. But hey, I'll try.
I thought using many translations would be more useful. I'll refrain from doing so in the future.
Actually, Jesus can is put to godlike status without assuming that he is the almighty God.
Note the italicized bit. There is no God other than God Himself. How can you call Jesus a god if he is not God Himself? The First Commandment - Thou shalt have no gods before Me. You cannot say that Jesus and God are two separate beings if you equate Jesus to a divine godlike status without Jesus actually being God.
In this first law, notice that Jehovah said "You must not have any other gods against my face."
If you look at the context of the following verses, we can see that he is explaining that he does not want anyone to worship any other gods than himself.
Now, when Jesus is viewed as "a God", this does not necessarily mean that he was intended to be worshiped, like the almighty God.
Ah, I dug a little deeper into this.On Matthew 28:17 - Really have no idea how to argue this one if you refuse to use the mainstream Protestant versions (KJV, NIV, etc.) because that's just what I used.
Well, I looked up Matthew 28:17 in the Greek Interlinear bible, and it used the greek word pros·ky·ne′o for the word worship.
So, I obtained some information from an article in a Watchtower from 1954 concerning the translation of the greek word pros·ky·ne′o.
I hope that clears some things up for you, and shows to you why the NWT's rendering is more accurate.The Greek word here rendered “worship” is the word pros·ky·ne′o.
Strange as it may seem, this word is drawn from the Greek word for “dog,” kýōn, and hence means, properly, “to crouch,
crawl, fawn,” as a dog would at his master’s feet. Practically applied, therefore, the word basically means “to prostrate
oneself, to bow down, to do obeisance.” And in the lands of the Bible this was the proper attitude both of civil veneration and
homage and also of religious worship. This appears from the Bible, both in the Hebrew original text and in the Greek.
In the King James or Authorized Version of the Bible pros·ky·ne′o is, without exception, in its 60 occurences, rendered “worship.” However, in the New World Translation pros·ky·ne′o is rendered “do obeisance” and “worship.” For example, the magi from the east and King Herod said they wanted to “do obeisance to” (pros·ky·ne′o) the babe that had been born king of the Jews. “Do obeisance” is preferable here because neither the magi nor King Herod meant to worship the babe as God. (Matt. 2:2, 8, 11) Pros·ky·ne′o is properly rendered “do obeisance” at times, because often in the Greek Septuagint Version of the Bible the action of this verb is directed to men; for example, where the patriarch Abraham bowed down (pros·ky·ne′o) to the pagan natives of Canaanland, the Hittites, the sons of Heth. (Gen. 23:7, 12, LXX) Or, as when the patriarch Jacob and his wives and his children all bowed down repeatedly (pros·ky·ne′o) to his twin-brother Esau, whom Jehovah God said He hated. (Gen. 33:3, 6, 7, LXX) Or, as when Emperor Nebuchadnezzar bowed down (pros·ky·ne′o) to the prophet Daniel. (Dan. 2:46, LXX) Other examples, such as Revelation 3:9, could be given where pros·ky·ne′o is not properly rendered “worship” but should be rendered “bow down” or “do obeisance.”
In the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures when this word pros·ky·ne′o is directed toward God, then it is properly rendered “worship,” as when Jesus answered the Tempter and said: “Go away, Satan! For it is written, ‘It is Jehovah your God you must worship [pros·ky·ne′o], and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.’” (Matt. 4:10, NW) To the Samaritan woman Jesus said: “The genuine worshipers will worship the Father with spirit and truth, for, indeed, the Father is looking for such kind to worship him. God is a Spirit, and those worshiping him must worship [pros·ky·ne′o] with spirit and truth.” (John 4:23, 24, NW) In each of these cases pros·ky·ne′o might have been rendered “bow down” or “do obeisance,” but certainly when we bow down or do obeisance to Jehovah God we do not do it in the same sense as when Abraham, Jacob and others bowed down or did obeisance to men. At John 4:23, 24, above, even Dr. Young’s literal translation of the Bible changes from “bow down” to “worship.” So the New World Translation is no more inconsistent than Dr. Young’s literal Bible translation. Bowing to men does not necessarily mean worship.
In the New World Translation we note that when this Greek verb pros·ky·ne′o is applied to Jesus as a man on earth or materializing as a man after his resurrection, it is translated “do obeisance.” However, when referring to the glorified Jesus in the invisible heavens in the presence of the holy angels, the New World Translation makes a change and renders pros·ky·ne′o as applied to him by the English word “worship.” (Heb. 1:6) This is properly and consistently done. This Greek verb occurs only twice in the book of Hebrews, here at Hebrews 1:6 and at Hebrews 11:21 where Jacob is described as worshiping Jehovah God: “By faith Jacob, when about to die, blessed each of the sons of Joseph and worshiped [pros·ky·ne′o] leaning upon the top of his staff.” (NW; referring to Genesis 47:31, where the LXX also uses pros·ky·ne′o) So in the book of Hebrews pros·ky·ne′o is both times rendered “worship” and the angels of God are instructed to “worship” the glorified Jesus. Why is this? Because Jesus has been made so much higher than the angels, even higher than he was before he became a man on earth. (Phil. 2:5-11) It is the command of Jehovah God that they do this toward his Son. What does this mean? This, that even the angels are to render their worship of Jehovah God through Jesus Christ, whom Jehovah God has made the Head of his universal organization. That is why it is stated on page 85 of the book “Make Sure of All Things”, column 1: “Christ to Be Worshiped as a Glorious Spirit, Victorious over Death on the Torture Stake,” with three scriptures accompanying to prove that he is now a glorified spirit, and now no more flesh.
It is because the glorified Jesus Christ acts as the appointed representative of Jehovah God that worship must go to God through him, even on the part of the angels. This explains why Psalm 97:7 and Deuteronomy 32:43, which, according to their context, evidently refer to Jehovah God, are applied by the writer of Hebrews to Jehovah’s Son Jesus Christ. The Son of God is Jehovah’s High Priest, hence subordinate to Jehovah God; but as High Priest according to the likeness of Melchizedek the glorified Jesus Christ leads all creation in the worship of Jehovah God. Hence worship of all creation must go to the one living and true God Jehovah through him. In the present-time fulfillment of Deuteronomy 32:43 and Psalm 97:7, the High Priest Jesus Christ acts as the direct representative for his Father Jehovah and, therefore, Hebrews 1:6 properly involves Jesus Christ glorified in the application of these scriptures. Well, then, since the angels are commanded to worship the glorified Jesus at his second coming, should not we, who, as humans, are so much less than angels, likewise worship him? In answer we say, We must render to him what God’s Word says we must.
At Revelation 19:10 and 22:9 the angel whom the glorified Jesus sent to the apostle John said to John: “Worship [pros·ky·ne′o] God,” meaning Jehovah God. Jesus’ angel (Rev. 1:1, 2; 22:16) told John, a man on earth, to worship, not Jesus, but God, Jehovah God the Father of Jesus. That is the One whom Jehovah’s witnesses worship. But we remember that such worship has to be rendered to Jehovah God through his High Priest Jesus Christ. For this reason it is that Jehovah’s witnesses follow the instruction of Philippians 2:10, 11: “So that in the name of Jesus every knee should bend of those in heaven [angels] and those on earth and those under the ground, and every tongue should openly confess that Jesus Christ is Lord [not the Almighty God, but Lord] to the glory of God the Father.” (NW) Jehovah’s witnesses “honor the Son just as they honor the Father,” for, “he that does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him.” (John 5:23, NW) Jehovah’s witnesses give to Jesus all the honor, respect, consideration, obedience, imitation, love and loyalty that Jehovah God calls upon them to render to his Son Jesus Christ. In Jesus’ name they render their prayers and worship to Jehovah God. And the angels of heaven obey the command of God and “worship” his Son only as their worship of the Son is related to the worship of his Father Jehovah God. But, keeping things in their relative positions, angels and Jehovah’s witnesses worship Jehovah God as the one Almighty God, uncreated, unbegotten, “from everlasting to everlasting.”—Ps. 90:2.
Well, how does your translation render that scripture?
Wow, that's a real bastardization of what the Bible really says in my opinion, but again, different translations. Useless to argue here as we both are sticking by our own translations...
Note: Bastardization? I find that quite offensive.
Re: religion
@ DJ? could you please compres your point?
that's why i don't like JW at my door. they're always taking too long to point something out.
(note: no offence)
that's why i don't like JW at my door. they're always taking too long to point something out.
(note: no offence)
me naam is m- Commander
- Number of posts : 9981
Registration date : 2007-12-26
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Religion
» Is There One True Religion?
» Evolution -NOT- religion
» My new religion commandments... :rofl:
» Is There One True Religion?
» Evolution -NOT- religion
» My new religion commandments... :rofl:
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum