Re: ideas about star trek tech

by Darkjedi 2008-02-23, 04:39

Too bad, well, I guess that's what the super scientists are for. lol!

by mokhrahikim 2008-02-26, 05:47

They should make transphasics!

by Philly Homer 2008-02-26, 19:04

How, though? That's the problem. How do you create something that fluxes in between space so it can pass through ship hulls?

by Jtull 2008-02-27, 01:16

hmm not possible realy.

by stewi0001 2008-02-27, 01:34

well I have no idea where you guys currently are on this topic and I'm too lazy right now to read all of it, but they have made a cloaking device, I wish I could find the article. I just know it was over a year ago....

by Darkjedi 2008-02-27, 02:04

Really, I would like to see that!

by stewi0001 2008-02-28, 23:00

so would I if I could only rememeber where lol!!!!

by Jtull 2008-02-28, 23:02

oh come on find it. Surprised

by Darkjedi 2008-02-29, 13:56

Use your friend, Google.

by Jtull 2008-02-29, 17:41

ok now we are off topic

by Philly Homer 2008-02-29, 17:48

@Stewi- Are you talking about that coat thing that someone made? It can blend into the background. It doesn't really render you invisible, the coat makes the air look slightly distorted.

@Jtull- Not really... just tallking about tech that we have today that could eventually become the Star Trek tech that we may eventually have.

by Jtull 2008-02-29, 18:00

oh pls just how the star trek tech.

by Philly Homer 2008-02-29, 18:05

That made no sense at all... Even when I spell-correct it...

"Oh please just how the Star Trek tech."

Oh please just how the Star Trek tech what, Jtull? That made absolutely no sense at all.

by Shemuel 2008-02-29, 18:59

Yeah what you're talking about Stewie is what Alkanosis said. They have loads of different cameras which sort of project an image. The Americans are trying it out in Afghanistan with tanks and it works quite well.

by Darkjedi 2008-03-10, 07:47

Well, we've had that technology for years, but we still don't have force fields. Sad

by Shemuel 2008-03-10, 16:04

Well, wev'e developed quite strong magnetic fields, but that's about it.

by me naam is m 2008-03-10, 16:30

we have propelled particles to speeds very close to that of light. partially using these magnetic fields.

by Shemuel 2008-03-10, 16:32

But on a large and relatively cheap scale is impossible at the moment, and we may well wipe ourselves out before then.

by me naam is m 2008-03-10, 16:47

what is not might come. but you're right.

by mokhrahikim 2008-03-12, 07:07

Um...I'm thinking of an idea that they use a star's light to make phasers...

_______________________

Ever played Red Alert 2??

"Prism Tanks"

by Philly Homer 2008-03-12, 07:57

Prism tank =/= Phaser.

Prism tank- Bends and distorts light, which means that destructive energy travels at the speed of light. Plus, you need a lot of space for all that equipment.

Phaser- Energy travels at sub-light speeds. Powered by an energy cell and fires nadion particles, I believe.

by mokhrahikim 2008-03-12, 08:20

Then they should make Solar PRISM weapons.

by me naam is m 2008-03-12, 11:47

meh. what are nadion particles?

by Philly Homer 2008-03-12, 16:36

mokhrahikim wrote:Then they should make Solar PRISM weapons.

Must our minds always be stuck on weapons and warfare? War is stupid and limits our capabilities to excel.

by mokhrahikim 2008-03-13, 02:42

by Jtull 2008-03-13, 03:51

but wepons are so awsome.

by me naam is m 2008-03-13, 11:44

Jtull wrote:but wepons are so awsome.

mainac.

but, it's true. you should see my maths exercise book. Rolling Eyes

"to secure for peace is to prepare for war." Julius Ceasar, and Metallica in "don't tread on me", black album. (officially the album is just called "Metallica" but due to the almost completely black cover...)

by Philly Homer 2008-03-13, 18:21

Not if we don't have weapons and don't have a violent nature.

by Shemuel 2008-03-13, 18:27

But we do

by Philly Homer 2008-03-13, 18:39

Hmm... I don't want to come off sounding like a liberal hippie or something, so I'll just concede and say that you all are warmongering, fundamentalist, maniacs.

by Shemuel 2008-03-13, 18:40

But is human nature itself very strong-willed?

by Philly Homer 2008-03-13, 18:47

Depends on whether or not you have a strong will near that of PETA-level. =P

by Jtull 2008-03-13, 21:33

that could be why humans in star trek made so powerfull ships.
because we need the power and we can get it.

by Shemuel 2008-03-14, 16:16

WAARGH!!! Bloodlust!!!!! ideas about star trek tech - Page 3 Icon_veryangry

by Philly Homer 2008-03-15, 00:13

Well, I don't support the human race ascending to a Star Trek level, because of it's morals and worldviews. It's somewhat PETA-like and very humanist.

by Jtull 2008-03-15, 02:05

1.

Shemuel wrote:WAARGH!!! Bloodlust!!!!!

2.

Well, I don't support the human race ascending to a Star Trek level, because of it's morals and worldviews. It's somewhat PETA-like and very humanist.

1. no power

2. huh? PETA? and whats so bad about threre morals?

anyway if I was in that kind of place I would just strive to better my position in sosity.

by Philly Homer 2008-03-15, 02:46

PETA is just... ugh... let's just put it this way; if I said that they think that we are the cause of every bad thing here, then I wouldn't be far off from the truth. Plus, they believe animals are more important than us. I don't want to sound narcissistic, but... That's just not right.

by Jtull 2008-03-15, 03:05

i agree.

by Philly Homer 2008-03-15, 03:27

-Sigh-

by Jtull 2008-03-15, 05:07

what?

and go do your duty Doctor Alkanosis.

by Philly Homer 2008-03-15, 23:29

Jtull wrote:what?

What? What?! You have the nerve to ask that? You're spamming again!

by Jtull 2008-03-16, 01:42

sorry I wanted to know what you were shihin for.

by Philly Homer 2008-03-16, 01:47

Well, I was referring to your "i agree" post, but I suppose I am just being a pedant. Sorry.

by Jtull 2008-03-16, 01:50

you forgiven.

now what shall we discuss?

by Philly Homer 2008-03-16, 01:57

Let's see, I still don't really understand FTL because according to my science teacher, it would take an infinite amount of energy to move even at the speed of light with a propulsion system. Plus, the faster you are going, the more strain is on you and if you even approach the speed of light, your body will disintegrate and turn into energy, just like when you go into a black hole.

by Jtull 2008-03-16, 02:02

yes its impossible to go at the speed of light but nothing says you cant go faster. lol!

any way warp your not actualy moveing that fast. your moveing space.

by Shemuel 2008-03-16, 09:23

You seem to go to a very open-minded catholic school

by Philly Homer 2008-03-16, 09:46

Here's the thing...

We have Jewish teachers, we have atheists and Jehovah's Witnesses and even Mormons that go to our school. Heck, I think there's a few Satanists/Luciferians as well... It's very open-minded. It also rejects the Pope's statement of non-Catholics=non-Christians.

by Shemuel 2008-03-16, 11:16

Did the pope say that?!

by Philly Homer 2008-03-16, 14:35

He said it while on his seat...throne... whatever it is, being all "infallible."

by Sponsored content