it's here well not quite

ok i got it via ftp and am using windows
13mins to get it installed via mar file look up on Mozilla i had to download the mar file because the exe was blocked by Mozilla any how yay!

is it me or is it that time of year when all the companies update there browser first chrome then i.e and now firefox. also the new firefox looks a hell of a lot better i might consider leaving chrome

IE 9 and FF4 kind a look similar to me.

im gonna have to try the ie 9 beta now but ie doesnt have themes and is generally anoying so i doubt ill use it.

i tried this, and it wouldn't load any web sites.

ff4 is faster than chrome i run both

FF looks the same as always to me

the address bar is wrong its below tabs

no its better more like chrome which is awesome

I downloaded the Beta for FF4, it's not bad for working on Xp Pro

it runs smooth

Really? It's faster than chrome? If that's the case, then FF will once again have everything. Fastest Browsing + Best Extension Collection + Security = Blow everyone else out of the water awesomeness

I find Chrome very slow. I personally don't like Chrome, just feels too basic to me that and it's really slow

I only started using Chrome because it was on a Laptop i used for a weekend, then that got me hooked on to it.

I use two browsers. FF with cache, cookies and everything else stopped. When combined with adblock, it uses about half the power chrome sucks out of my battery. Chrome is for when I'm on mains, and want twiddly bits to a browser. However, I'll seriously be considering looking at the 'profiles' options of FF to have two forms of the browser (energy-efficient and full options). This is mainly because even though Chrome has the sleek design, it can't hide the poor performance on multiple tabs. It's terrible!

Never used Chrome, when I was smaller and first got into comps, I thought it was a add - on or a widget.

I use Mozilla Firefox, it's superior than crap Internet Explorer. I installed Internet Explorer from Microsoft's site to see if it works, then I got a ' gift ', a virus. Then it suddenly ' recommends ' Microsofts costly Anti - Virus saying it's ' superior '... If Microsoft can infect people's computers and try to convince them to buy costly software, then that shows how bad they are...

Macs are better, my mom uses a Mac, and it's way better. PCs are s***, older ones are better than the current ones. Trying to give you the least amount of memory and Ram possible and increasing the price? What the f***.

IE, wasn't build for a Mac, and you prob got an infected version of IE, by DLing it from a dodgie provider.

I got it from Microsoft, I installed it on my computer not my mom's, my computer is a PC, my mom has the only Mac. And I didn't get it from a dodgie provider..... My computer constantly scans, I set it that way, it may slow it down a little but hey, I'm safe.

see it's people like you who claim macs are superior in every way that make people hate mac, fact mac's aren't perfect and neither is windows but that's just life and people need to deal with it.

I agree, Macs do have negative points like everything, I just prefer them significantly more than Windows PC's.

I've never used a Mac,but wouldn't Say Wins is perfect either.

Nuchiha101 wrote:Never used Chrome, when I was smaller and first got into comps, I thought it was a add - on or a widget.

Google Chrome was released two years ago. Re-evaluate statement.

Nuchiha101 wrote:I use Mozilla Firefox, it's superior than crap Internet Explorer. I installed Internet Explorer from Microsoft's site to see if it works, then I got a ' gift ', a virus. Then it suddenly ' recommends ' Microsofts costly Anti - Virus saying it's ' superior '... If Microsoft can infect people's computers and try to convince them to buy costly software, then that shows how bad they are...

Yep, like Vedic, you either had a pre-existing problem, or you downloaded it from a dodgy site. Say what you like about Microsoft being moneygrabbing and unhelpful, they're not criminal in that way.

Nuchiha101 wrote:Macs are better, my mom uses a Mac, and it's way better. PCs are s***, older ones are better than the current ones. Trying to give you the least amount of memory and Ram possible and increasing the price? What the f***.

1. Newer computers are undoubtedly more powerful. They continue to become better value for money, otherwise ATARI would be raking it in.
2. Macs are more expensive. Although it doesn't directly compare, when I was researching laptops I found that you paid roughly double for Macs with similar specs to normal laptops.

Anyway, enjoy your Windows 3.1

On your last point shem, yes, the Macs are overpriced, but despite having the same specs, the Mac ones run smoother and rarely overheat and the multitasking is better. Part of it is the Macs don't take up nearly as many system resources as Windows, so in a weird way, you get more out of it even though the stats are pretty much the same. That and the monitors are definitely better

You're right. I misread Nunchincha's post (wasn't he banned?), thinking he was saying Macs were cheaper.

Darkwing wrote:I find Chrome very slow. I personally don't like Chrome, just feels too basic to me that and it's really slow

Amen, too basic. And slow too! I know it loads pages "faster", but I don't like the way it loads them. It's not as smooth as FF.

Shemuel wrote:I use two browsers. FF with cache, cookies and everything else stopped. When combined with adblock, it uses about half the power chrome sucks out of my battery. Chrome is for when I'm on mains, and want twiddly bits to a browser. However, I'll seriously be considering looking at the 'profiles' options of FF to have two forms of the browser (energy-efficient and full options). This is mainly because even though Chrome has the sleek design, it can't hide the poor performance on multiple tabs. It's terrible!

I had problems with multiple profiles in FF in the past. I don't know if it's fixed yet, but if not, don't open two instances of the program on different profiles at the same time.

I found Chrome loaded pages slowly as well. Was approx 10 seconds on Chrome whereas FF loaded pages in about 4